When you submit an enquiry via our website, we use the personal data you supply to respond to your query, including providing you with any requested information about our products and services. We may also email you several times after your enquiry in order to follow up on your interest and ensure that we have answered your it to your satisfaction. We will do this based on our legitimate interest in providing accurate information prior to a sale. Your enquiry is stored and processed as an email which is hosted by Microsoft within the European Economic Area (EEA). We keep enquiry emails for two years, after which they are securely archived and kept for seven years, when we delete them.
When getting to grips with ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standards for the first time, you will notice that they are structured in clauses, a bit like a contract. This structure is common across all of the management system standards that ISO publishes, such as ISO9001, ISO14001 and ISO/IEC 27001, and is known as the “Annex SL” format or, more helpfully, the “High Level Structure”. So, what we’re about to say applies to all of these standards whether we’re interested in quality management (ISO9001), environmental management (ISO14000) or business continuity (ISO22301). Note however that the Annex SL wording has evolved over time, so the exact format and wording of each standard depends not only on its subject, but also on when it was last revised.
Clause 6 of the management system consists of three subclauses:
Let’s look at each of these in turn to better understand what they require us to do.
Subclause 6.1 of the ISO management system standards deals with the actions required to address risks and opportunities related to the requirements of interested parties. This subclause emphasizes the importance of identifying, analysing, and evaluating risks and opportunities that can affect an organization’s ability to achieve its objectives. It fits in with one of the key principles of ISO management systems, which is risk-based thinking.
Risk-based thinking is a fundamental concept in ISO management systems, such as ISO 9001 (quality management) and ISO 14001 (environmental management). It is an approach that enables organizations to identify and manage risks and opportunities that could impact their objectives, performance, and stakeholders. It involves considering potential risks and opportunities at every stage of the quality management process, from planning to delivery, in order to prevent or mitigate negative outcomes and maximize positive outcomes. This approach emphasizes proactive and preventive actions, rather than reactive measures.
For instance, in ISO 9001 the key principles are to:
By adopting a risk-based thinking approach, organizations can identify and address potential risks and opportunities in a proactive manner, leading to more efficient and effective quality management practices, increased customer satisfaction, and improved overall performance.
Some of the benefits of adopting risk-based thinking are:
To summarise risk-based thinking, it is a critical component of ISO management systems that can help organizations to make better decisions, increase resilience, and drive continuous improvement.
The following are some examples of how the requirements in this subclause can be applied in practice:
Let’s look at an example of how risks and opportunities relate to the interested parties of the management system.
The above table sets out the following:
Remember that this sub-clause is linked to sub-clause 4.2. which is titled Understand the needs and expectations of interested parties, so using the same columns 1 and 2 in the table above would help to show an auditor alignment.
Overall, clause 6.1 of the ISO management system standards requires organizations to take a proactive approach to managing risks and opportunities. By identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks and maximizing opportunities, organizations can improve their performance, meet their objectives, and remain competitive in their industries.
ISO management system objectives refer to the goals and targets set by an organization to achieve compliance with ISO standards. These objectives help organizations to establish a framework for consistent and effective management practices across all areas of their operations, leading to improved efficiency, customer satisfaction, and overall performance.
The actions used to achieve ISO management system objectives typically involve a systematic and structured approach that includes the following steps:
Some common actions that organizations take to achieve ISO management system objectives include:
A business objective is a specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound goal that an organization sets to achieve its overall mission and vision. Business objectives are usually focused on improving the organization’s financial performance, customer satisfaction, market share, employee engagement, or other strategic areas of focus.
On the other hand, an ISO management system objective is a specific goal that an organization sets to meet the requirements of a specific ISO management system standard, such as ISO 9001 (Quality Management), ISO 27001 (Information Security Management). ISO management system objectives are designed to improve the organization’s management practices, processes, and systems to meet the requirements of the relevant standard. These also need to be SMART.
While business objectives and ISO management system objectives are different, they are not mutually exclusive. In fact, an organization can use ISO management system objectives to achieve its business objectives. For example, an organization may set an ISO management system objective to improve its product quality, which can help it achieve its business objective of improving customer satisfaction and market share.
Additionally, an organization may set business objectives that align with ISO management system standards, such as reducing its environmental impact, which can help it achieve compliance with ISO 14001.
This part of the clause deals with changes to the management system, and requires them to be adequately carried out, with due regard to what’s intended to be achieved, and making sure that all of the relevant parts of the system are updated consistently. This involves identifying when a change is happening, understanding its consequences for the management system, and then implementing it smoothly. A simple change management process will help to achieve this.
While there are similarities in the requirements of Clause 6 across ISO management systems written in the Annex SL format, there may also be some differences based on the specific standard and its focus. Here are some key differences you may encounter in the requirements of Clause 6 for different ISO management systems:
While these are some notable differences, it’s important to remember that the Annex SL format establishes a common high-level structure and core requirements across ISO management systems. This allows for easier integration and alignment of different management systems within an organization, facilitating synergies and streamlining the overall management system approach. However, each specific ISO standard has its own unique context and requirements that reflect the nature of the discipline it addresses.
Clause 6 in an ISO management system written in the Annex SL format serves as a critical link between various other clauses of the standard. It establishes the foundation for effective planning and management of changes throughout the management system. Here’s how Clause 6 typically connects with other clauses.
Clause 6 is the core of identifying risks, opportunities and improvements within the ISO management standards.
There are variations of the requirements as stated earlier, but these are the core requirements.
Overall, Clause 6 acts as a vital thread that runs through the entire management system, linking together various aspects of planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement. It ensures that changes within the organization are effectively planned, managed, monitored, and improved in alignment with the organization’s context, leadership commitment, and strategic objectives.
Written by Ken Holmes and Ted Spiller.
Ken is CertiKit’s Managing Director and Lead Toolkit Creator. Ken is a CISSP-qualified security and data protection specialist who also holds the internationally-recognised Certified Information Privacy Professional – Europe (CIPP/E).
Ted is CertiKit’s Compliance Consultant, and an expert in many ISO management systems; he is a Lead Auditor for ISO27001, ISO9001 and ISO14001 and Auditor for ISO45001 and ISO22301.
CertiKit’s ISO Toolkits and ISO Services are available help you understand and implement your chosen ISO standard(s). The toolkits include easy to understand templates and guides, plus a perpetual licence with ongoing updates and support, so you’ve got help whenever you need it.
Click the links to find out more about the ISO Toolkits and ISO Services.